Abstract
Scientific research—especially high-impact research—is increasingly being performed in teams that are interdisciplinary and demographically diverse. Nevertheless, very little research has investigated how the climate on these diverse science teams affects data sharing or the experiences of their members. To address these gaps, we conducted a quantitative study of 266 scientists from 105 NSF-funded interdisciplinary environmental science teams. We examined how team climate mediates the associations between team diversity and three outcomes: satisfaction with the team, satisfaction with authorship practices, and perceptions of the frequency of data sharing. Using path analyses, we found that individuals from underrepresented groups perceived team climate more negatively, which was associated with lower satisfaction with the team and more negative perceptions of authorship practices and data sharing on the team. However, individuals on teams with more demographic diversity reported a more positive climate than those on teams with less demographic diversity. These results highlight the importance of team climate, the value of diverse teams for team climate, and barriers to the full inclusion and support of individuals from underrepresented groups in interdisciplinary science teams.
Highlights
Several trends are transforming contemporary scientific practices
We propose that team climate is a critical factor for addressing these challenges and promoting the success of diverse science teams
We used the conceptual model described in Fig 1 and conducted two path analyses, one with each set of diversity composites as the predictor variables
Summary
Several trends are transforming contemporary scientific practices. In most disciplines, scientific research is increasingly being conducted in teams [1,2,3], and these teams are becoming increasingly interdisciplinary in order to tackle grand challenges that require multiple disciplinary perspectives [4,5]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have