Abstract
In this article, we aim to, firstly, examine the social representations of a group of trainee Primary-Education teachers (n = 62) with regard to both the procedures and the social purposes of teaching History at school and, particularly, the role of women in History lessons. Secondly, we attempt to intervene in those representations and to evaluate the potential impact of a teacher training programme both in and for education in gender equality. Empirically, we employ a quantitative (means and standard deviations) and inferential (Wilcoxon’s signed-rank and Kendall’s tau-b tests) pre-experimental, pre-test/post-test design with no control group. The results shed light on the generalised acceptance of critical curricular focuses in History lessons that are directed towards training in historical and social thinking skills from a gender perspective. The sex of prospective teachers does not seem to influence these results. Likewise, these results confirm the didactic potential of using critical literacy resources in the classroom for improving the visibility of women and the female experience in the historic–social discourse of History as it is taught and in the promotion of models of global citizenship.
Highlights
Recent research underlines the fact that current curricula and textbooks continue to leave women invisible in the representations of students and trainee teachers, as they build on a framework of hegemonic discourse with markedly androcentric character [1,2]
The removal of the stereotypical persistence of desirable gender models [5] can be achieved through teacher training in History and Social Sciences in order to redefine the end-purposes of History teaching and question their present narratives
The presence and leading role of women in History lessons will not be done through additional inclusions in specific quotations or annexes, but through the discourse of change [6], with the aim of constructing integral social knowledge
Summary
Recent research underlines the fact that current curricula and textbooks continue to leave women invisible in the representations of students and trainee teachers, as they build on a framework of hegemonic discourse with markedly androcentric character [1,2]. The absence of the historical role of women as citizens and main characters in History, evident in the assignment of architypes and integrated in the collective imagination, is still recognisable today in both curricular programmes and teaching practice [3,4]. The presence and leading role of women in History lessons will not be done through additional inclusions in specific quotations or annexes, but through the discourse of change [6], with the aim of constructing integral social knowledge. Using this valuable information and reflecting on what might intervene
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.