Abstract
Firms that issue convertible exchangeable preferred stock can later exchange it for debt with identical conversion and cash flow rights, thus capturing interest tax deductions when they can benefit from them. Despite tax and transaction-cost advantages, many issuers forego this innovative security in favor of otherwise identical, traditional convertible preferred stock. Tests of two potential explanations are presented, that issuers of the traditional security: specialize in serving an investor clientele that wants to avoid owning convertible bonds, or signal that they expect to force conversion into common equity earlier, implying a higher firm value. The evidence favors the clientele explanation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.