Abstract

Pasquale Pistone stressed very recently in this journal `the growing importance of the prohibition of state aids in tax matters´ (Intertax 2012, p. 84). This is a fair point. The following article illustrates and expands upon this by focusing on critical issues arising from the German 'reorganization clause' by way of example. For a business, it is important to understand when it might be in a position to bring an action before the General Court. Furthermore, the question arises what makes a tax clause, such as the German reorganization clause, selective in nature. At a glance, a tax rule seems to have a general character which is not likely to constitute a form of aid. Moreover, given that as things stand there remains considerable uncertainty surrounding the question when a tax measure constitutes unlawful State Aid, where a Commission decision breaks new ground. In that respect, the question arises whether a decision of the Commission which finds a tax rule to be State Aid may have retroactive effect or whether this retroactive effect would violate the protection of the legitimate expectations of the taxpayers.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.