Abstract
Using the Targeted Poverty Alleviation (TPA) disclosure policy in China as a quasi-natural experiment, this paper analyzes the impact of firm TPA disclosure on analyst forecast accuracy based on a staggered difference-in-differences model. The results show a significant increase in the accuracy of analysts’ forecasts after firms’ disclosure of TPA information, and this effect is more pronounced for firms with greater information processing cost and firms with fewer covering analysts. Our study provides empirical evidence for regulators concerned with the information environment of capital market.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
