Abstract
The dominant theoretical perspective guiding research on economic sanctions views sanctions as tools of bargaining. This implies that senders and targets are engaged in strategic interaction and that each is basing its decisions, in part, on its expectations regarding how its opponent will react. In this paper, we test a number of hypotheses derived from a game-theoretic model developed by Morgan and Miers (1999) that focus specifically on the bargaining processes in sanctions episodes. Our results provide no support for these hypotheses and seem to suggest that sanctions senders and targets are paying very little attention to each other, at least in a manner consistent with the theory. We conclude with a consideration of why this might be the case and with some speculation regarding what this means for future research into the processes of economic sanctions. In short, we believe our results indicate that a new theoretical paradigm, focusing on legal enforcement and economic adjustment at the micro level is in order.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
