Abstract

To conduct a meta-analysis of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (R-fMRI) studies in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and in adults with ADHD to assess spatial convergence of findings from available studies. Based on a preregistered protocol in PROSPERO (CRD42019119553), a large set of databases were searched up to April 9, 2019, with no language or article type restrictions. Study authors were systematically contacted for additional unpublished information/data. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging studies using seed-based connectivity (SBC) or any other method (non-SBC) reporting whole-brain results of group comparisons between participants with ADHD and typically developing controls were eligible. Voxelwise meta-analysis via activation likelihood estimation with cluster-level familywise error (voxel-level: p< .001; cluster-level: p< .05) was used. Thirty studies (18 SBC and 12 non-SBC), comprising 1,978 participants (1,094 with ADHD; 884 controls) were retained. The meta-analysis focused on SBC studies found no significant spatial convergence of ADHD-related hyperconnectivity or hypoconnectivity across studies. This nonsignificant finding remained after integrating 12 non-SBC studies into the main analysis and in sensitivity analyses limited to studies including only children or only non-medication-naïve patients. The lack of significant spatial convergence may be accounted for by heterogeneity in study participants, experimental procedures, and analytic flexibility as well as in ADHD pathophysiology. Alongside other neuroimaging meta-analyses in other psychiatric conditions, the present results should inform the conduct and publication of future neuroimaging studies of psychiatric disorders.

Highlights

  • L anterior hippocampus: [ iFC with L STG, Bil parietal lobe, and R SMG; Y iFC with temporal pole and R parietal lobe

  • Our results suggest that each of these hypotheses is supported by a limited set of studies, but none of them are supported by evidence across available studies subjected to meta-analysis in an atheoretical and unbiased data-driven manner

  • Given the challenges of selecting clinically homogeneous samples of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) defined categorically, we argue that a dimensional approach, sufficiently powered to allow multiple distinct dimensions to be examined, should be more consistently implemented

Read more

Summary

Methods

We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)[16] recommendations and the published best practice on the conduct of neuroimaging meta-analyses.[17] Here, the term systematic review is used in accordance to the Cochrane definition The protocol was registered in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42019119553). In the spirit of Open Science, the full dataset used for analyses will be freely available online in the open source platform ANIMA (http://anima.fz-juelich.de/)[18] on publication of this article. Search With the support of a librarian, we searched PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Biological Abstracts, EMBASE ClassicþEMBASE, PsycINFO, BIOSIS Previews, and Web of Science (Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS, Food Science and Technology Abstracts) databases, from inception to April 9, 2019, with no language or article type restrictions. Details on the search strategy/ syntax are reported in Appendix 1, Supplement 1, available online

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call