Systematic Data Analysis and Diagnostic Machine Learning Reveal Differences between Compounds with Single- and Multitarget Activity.

Abstract

Small molecules with multitarget activity are capable of triggering polypharmacological effects and are of high interest in drug discovery. Compared to single-target compounds, promiscuity also affects drug distribution and pharmacodynamics and alters ADMET characteristics. Features distinguishing between compounds with single- and multitarget activity are currently only little understood. On the basis of systematic data analysis, we have assembled large sets of promiscuous compounds with activity against related or functionally distinct targets and the corresponding compounds with single-target activity. Machine learning predicted promiscuous compounds with surprisingly high accuracy. Molecular similarity analysis combined with control calculations under varying conditions revealed that accurate predictions were largely determined by structural nearest-neighbor relationships between compounds from different classes. We also found that large proportions of promiscuous compounds with activity against related or unrelated targets and corresponding single-target compounds formed analog series with distinct chemical space coverage, which further rationalized the predictions. Moreover, compounds with activity against proteins from functionally distinct classes were often active against unique targets that were not covered by other promiscuous compounds. The results of our analysis revealed that nearest-neighbor effects determined the prediction of promiscuous compounds and that preferential partitioning of compounds with single- and multitarget activity into structurally distinct analog series was responsible for such effects, hence providing a rationale for the presence of different structure-promiscuity relationships.