Abstract

The ecological impacts of invasive plants have served to justify the cost of their management, which is estimated to exceed $1 billion annually in the US alone. However, our understanding of the ecological impacts of most invasive plants is extremely limited, and when known, interpretation is confounded with varied measurements and methods. While this can provide important information about specific components of ecosystem function, it limits our understanding of the broader scope of impacts any one species may have. Using Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum) as a study system, our objectives were to (1) survey a broad suite of 29 important ecological impact metrics (EIMs), (2) identify invader cover‐EIM relationships, and (3) test if the comparative reference (uninvaded or invader removal) influences interpretation. Japanese stiltgrass had the strongest effect on the plant community, followed by soil properties, soil nutrients, and other abiotic/biotic factors. Many EIM values differed among reference types, and plant community EIMs were reduced with increasing Japanese stiltgrass abundance. For example, plant biodiversity was lower in the invasion when compared to both removed and uninvaded sites; however, soil organic matter was higher only in the uninvaded site when compared to the invasion. The integrative ecosystem metric E(c) also showed that the system overall was impacted by the Japanese stiltgrass invasion, and this varied among sites. Interestingly, relationships among EIMs were also changed by the presence of Japanese stiltgrass. For example, a strong correlation between pH and soil organic matter disappeared when Japanese stiltgrass was present. Together this suggests that this invaded ecosystem functions in a different way through both individual and correlated alterations to ecosystem properties.

Highlights

  • Invasive species can have strong negative impacts on ecosystem function, and are globally ranked as one of the top five threats to biodiversity (Millenium Ecosystem Assessment 2005)

  • Plant ecological impact metrics (EIMs) were most strongly impacted by Japanese stiltgrass, but all impact categories had at least one EIM altered by the invasion

  • Several plant metrics were negatively correlated with increasing Japanese stiltgrass cover, while all other metrics were either unchanged, or changed in a binary fashion—suggesting that ecosystem processes can respond in either a density-dependent or independent fashion, at least given the range of covers observed here

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Invasive species can have strong negative impacts on ecosystem function, and are globally ranked as one of the top five threats to biodiversity (Millenium Ecosystem Assessment 2005). Of the .14,000 exotic invasive plants estimated to inhabit North America, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand, less than 200 have any quantitative assessments of ecological impact (Hulme et al 2013). Of these studied species, ;40% include only one ecological impact metric (EIM; e.g., native plant richness, pH), ;35% have only two EIMs, and .95% have had fewer than five EIMs examined (Hulme et al 2013). This shortcoming in our understanding of the broader ecological impacts of invasive plants could have repercussions on management decisions, budget allocations, and regulations intended to limit invader impact (Quinn et al 2013)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call