Abstract

The mammalian circadian timing system consists of a master pacemaker in neurons of the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) and clocks of a similar molecular makeup in most peripheral body cells. Peripheral oscillators are self-sustained and cell autonomous, but they have to be synchronized by the SCN to ensure phase coherence within the organism. In principle, the rhythmic expression of genes in peripheral organs could thus be driven not only by local oscillators, but also by circadian systemic signals. To discriminate between these mechanisms, we engineered a mouse strain with a conditionally active liver clock, in which REV-ERBα represses the transcription of the essential core clock gene Bmal1 in a doxycycline-dependent manner. We examined circadian liver gene expression genome-wide in mice in which hepatocyte oscillators were either running or arrested, and found that the rhythmic transcription of most genes depended on functional hepatocyte clocks. However, we discovered 31 genes, including the core clock gene mPer2, whose expression oscillated robustly irrespective of whether the liver clock was running or not. By contrast, in liver explants cultured in vitro, circadian cycles of mPer2::luciferase bioluminescence could only be observed when hepatocyte oscillators were operational. Hence, the circadian cycles observed in the liver of intact animals without functional hepatocyte oscillators were likely generated by systemic signals. The finding that rhythmic mPer2 expression can be driven by both systemic cues and local oscillators suggests a plausible mechanism for the phase entrainment of subsidiary clocks in peripheral organs.

Highlights

  • In mammals, virtually all body cells possess self-sustained, cell-autonomous circadian clocks [1,2,3]

  • In contrast to previously held belief, molecular circadian oscillators are not restricted to specialized pacemaker tissues, such as the brain’s suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), but exist in virtually all body cells

  • The circadian clocks operative in peripheral cell types are as robust as those residing in SCN neurons, they quickly become desynchronized in vitro due to variations in period length

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Virtually all body cells possess self-sustained, cell-autonomous circadian clocks [1,2,3]. The accumulation of mPER1 and/ or mPER2, two integral clock components, is altered upon the administration of phase-shifting cues These proteins are likely to be involved in the synchronization of circadian clocks [10,11]. Mammalian circadian oscillators are thought to rely on two interconnected negative loops of clock gene expression [12,13]. According to this model, the principal feedback loop is driven by the repressors PER1, PER2, CRY1, and CRY2 and the PAS-domain basic helix-loophelix (PAS-bHLH) transcription factors BMAL1, CLOCK, and probably NPAS2 [14]. Since BMAL1 and CLOCK are metabolically more stable than CRY and PER proteins, their abundance varies only slightly throughout the day [16,18,19]

Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.