Abstract

Current interpretations of seismic observations typically argue for significant chemical heterogeneity being present in the two large low shear velocity provinces under Africa and the Pacific. Recently, however, it has been suggested that large lateral temperature variations in the lowermost mantle resulting from a strong thermal gradient across D? may provide an alternative explanation. In case of a high heat flux from the core into the mantle, the magnitude of shear wave velocity variations in tomographic models can be reconciled with isochemical whole mantle flow and a pyrolite composition. So far, the hypothesis of strong core heating has been tested in a consistent manner only against tomographic S-wave velocity models, but not against P-wave velocity models. Here, we explore a new approach to assess geodynamic models and test the assumption of isochemical whole mantle flow with strong core heating directly against the statistics of observed traveltime variations of both P and S waves. Using a spectral element method, we simulate 3-D global wave propagation for periods down to 10 s in synthetic 3-D elastic structures derived from a geodynamic model. Seismic heterogeneity is predicted by converting the temperature field of a high-resolution mantle circulation model (MCM) into seismic velocities using thermodynamic models of mantle mineralogy. Being based on forward modelling only, this approach avoids the problems of limited resolution and non-uniqueness inherent in tomographic inversions while taking all possible finite-frequency effects into account. Capturing the correct physics of wave propagation allows for a consistent test of the assumption of high core heat flow against seismic data. The statistics of long-period body wave traveltime observations show a markedly different behaviour for P and S waves: the standard deviation of P-wave delay times stays almost constant with turning depth, whereas that of the S-wave delay times increases strongly throughout the mantle. Surprisingly, synthetic traveltime variations computed for the isochemical MCM reproduce these different trends. This is not expected from a ray-theoretical point of view and highlights the importance of finite-frequency effects. Most importantly, the large lateral temperature variations in the lower mantle related to strong core heating are able to explain most of the standard deviation of observed P- and S-wave delay times. This is a strong indication that seismic heterogeneity in the lower mantle is likely dominated by thermal variations on the length scales relevant for long-period body waves.

Highlights

  • Long-standing questions in the study of Earth’s deep interior are about the origin of seismic heterogeneity and the nature of flow inC 2012 The Authors Geophysical Journal International C 2012 RAS the mantle

  • Before we concentrate on the statistics of our synthetic data, it is informative to look at the geographical distribution of traveltime variations computed for the synthetic mantle structure and to check whether the traveltimes carry any imprint of the mantle circulation model (MCM)

  • We have presented synthetic seismograms and a corresponding data set of traveltime variations for a synthetic mantle structure derived from geodynamic considerations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Long-standing questions in the study of Earth’s deep interior are about the origin of seismic heterogeneity and the nature of flow inC 2012 The Authors Geophysical Journal International C 2012 RAS the mantle. To improve conceptual models of mantle flow, the major challenges in seismology today are to efficiently mine the wealth of information contained in seismic waveforms and to constrain the relative contributions of thermal anomalies and compositional variations to the observed seismic heterogeneity. It has been proposed that these ‘superplumes’ are chemically distinct from the rest of the mantle, as they have sharp vertical boundaries and show anticorrelated variations in shear (vs) and bulk sound velocity (vφ) as well as evidence for an increased density (van der Hilst & Karason 1999; Masters et al 2000; Ishii & Tromp 2001; Wen et al 2001; Ni et al 2002; Ritsema & van Heijst 2002; Trampert et al 2004; Wang & Wen 2004; To et al 2005)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call