Abstract
Four copper(I) complexes [Cu4(μ3-Cl)4(μ-dtbpf)2] (1), [Cu6(μ3-Br)4(μ2-Br)2(μ-dtbpf)3] (2), [Cu4(μ2-I)2(μ3-I)2(μ-dtbpf)2] (2) and [Cu2(μ1-CN)2(κ(2)-dtbpf)2] (4) were prepared using CuX (X = Cl, Br, I, CN) and 1,1'-bis(di-tert-butylphosphino)ferrocene (dtbpf) in 2 : 1 molar ratio in DCM-MeOH (50 : 50 V/V) at room temperature. These complexes were characterized by elemental analyses, IR, (1)H and (31)P NMR, ESI(+)-MS and electronic absorption spectroscopy. Molecular structures of the complexes 1,2 and 3 were determined crystallographically. Complexes 1 and 3 are tetrameric Cu(I) pseudo-cubane like structures with a Cu4Cl4 core, and a stepped cubane-like structure with a Cu4I4 core, respectively, whereas complex 2 shows a trimeric copper(I) framework containing two [Cu3(μ3-Br)2(μ2-Br)] units that are bridged by three bidentate μ-dtbpf ligands. Each [Cu3(μ3-Br)2(μ2-Br)] unit forms a pyramid with one copper atom at the apex and one of the triangular faces capped by one bromine atom. All the complexes were found to be efficient catalysts for the Sonogashira reaction. The coupling products were obtained in moderate to good yields (58-99%) using Pd loadings of 0.2 mol% as well as complex loading of 0.1 mol%. The (31)P NMR studies show that all the complexes are unstable during the course of tandem catalytic reaction and the dtbpf ligand migrates from copper(I) to palladium(II), which promotes palladium Sonogashira cross-coupling of activated and non-activated aryl halides.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.