Abstract

Dry reforming of propane has been carried out over alumina-supported 5wt%Co–10wt%Ni and 5wt%Mo–10wt%Ni catalysts. Catalysts were characterised using liquid N2 adsorption, H2 chemisorption, XRD, temperature-programmed desorption of NH3 and CO2, temperature-programmed reduction (with H2) as well as oxidation of spent catalysts. Time-on-stream analysis revealed that Mo–Ni catalyst has higher H2, CO and CO2 but lower CH4 formation rates compared to Co–Ni catalyst, while H2:CO ratio were almost the same in both catalysts. However, conversion-time analysis showed that Mo–Ni catalyst was more stable and active during a 72h run while Co–Ni suffered noticeable deactivation after 30h of reaction. Reaction–deactivation models implicated a higher deactivation coefficient (kd) with activation energy of Ed=78.1kJmol−1 for Co–Ni catalyst, while Mo–Ni showed lower deactivation coefficient with smaller activation energy (Ed=69.4kJmol−1). Post-mortem analysis (TOC and TPR-TPO) of spent catalysts confirmed that the surface of Co–Ni catalyst has more carbon residue than the Mo–Ni sample consistent with the higher deactivation of Co–Ni.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call