Abstract

In wetland environments, vegetation has an important role in ecological functioning. The main goal of this work was to identify an optimal combination of Sentinel-1 (S1), Sentinel-2 (S2), and Pleiades data using ground-reference data to accurately map wetland macrophytes in the Danube Delta. We tested several combinations of optical and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) data rigorously at two levels. First, in order to reduce the confusion between reed (Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud.) and other macrophyte communities, a time series analysis of S1 data was performed. The potential of S1 for detection of compact reed on plaur, compact reed on plaur/reed cut, open reed on plaur, pure reed, and reed on salinized soil was evaluated through time series of backscatter coefficient and coherence ratio images, calculated mainly according to the phenology of the reed. The analysis of backscattering coefficients allowed separation of reed classes that strongly overlapped. The coherence coefficient showed that C-band SAR repeat pass interferometric coherence for cut reed detection is feasible. In the second section, random forest (RF) classification was applied to the S2, Pleiades, and S1 data and in situ observations to discriminate and map reed against other aquatic macrophytes (submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), emergent macrophytes, some floating broad-leaved and floating vegetation of delta lakes). In addition, different optical indices were included in the RF. A total of 67 classification models were made in several sensor combinations with two series of validation samples (with the reed and without reed) using both a simple and more detailed classification schema. The results showed that reed is completely discriminable compared to other macrophyte communities with all sensor combinations. In all combinations, the model-based producer’s accuracy (PA) and user’s accuracy (UA) for reed with both nomenclatures were over 90%. The diverse combinations of sensors were valuable for improving the overall classification accuracy of all of the communities of aquatic macrophytes except Myriophyllum spicatum L.

Highlights

  • Wetlands are described as “the lands of transition zone between aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems where the land is covered by shallow water” [1]

  • Identification, and classification of wetland macrophytes using remote sensing are important because this data provide many beneficial services in planning, restoring, and managing wetlands

  • This study showed that the chosen methodology is good for mapping the wetland macrophytes with freely available spatial data at a good temporal resolution, due to addition of the S1, S2, and Pleiades

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Wetlands are described as “the lands of transition zone between aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems where the land is covered by shallow water” [1]. Wetlands (marshes, peat bogs, coastal mudflats, alluvial forests, etc.) form a complex set of environments. They have a high biological productivity and great biological diversity and are considered dynamic ecologically. Wetland vegetation is an important component of wetland ecosystems and plays an important role in maintaining ecosystem structure and function [2]. Wetland vegetation ecosystems depend on water levels and climate change, especially changes in precipitation, is likely to have a significant impact on these habitats and associated species. Phragmites australis (common reed) is one of the most widely distributed wetland macrophyte plant species. Reed is a key species and plays a significant role in wetland ecosystems, with high biomass and abundance

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call