Abstract

Although major depressive disorder (MDD) also increases the risk of Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) perpetration, poor mental health has been mostly conceptualized as a consequence of IPV victimization rather than a risk factor for IPV perpetration. Poor impulse control is another IPV risk factor. Building on a risk / risk framework, this study investigates additive and multiplicative effects of male partners' MDD and poor impulse control on physical IPV victimization reported by female partner. This national longitudinal study followed a random sample of 2,500 male and female cohabiting partners for two years in United States. Data came from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study (FFCWS). Male partner's MDD was the independent variable. Baseline socio-demographic factors (age, relation status, education level, income, and minority status) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD), and Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) were covariates. Outcome was female partner's physical IPV victimization measured at baseline and two years later. Male partner's impulse control was the moderator. Model I tested independent effects of MDD and impulse control on physical IPV. Model II used multi-group structural equation model to test the effect of MDD in those with low and poor impulse control. All participants provided written consent and SPSS and AMOS were used for data analysis. In Model 1 that tested additive effects of SES, GAD, AUD, MDD, and poor impulse control did not show main effects of MDD or impulse control on an increase in perpetration of physical IPV over two years. Model 2 showed that MDD predicts an increase in perpetration of physical IPV of men with poor impulse control, but not men with high impulse control. Based on the findings, poor impulse control and MDD have synergistic effects on IPV committed by men. Given the synergistic effects of psychological determinants of IPV, there is a need for prevention of IPV in male partners who have multiple risk factors such as MDD and poor impulse control. Self-regulation trainings of depressed men with poor impulse control may reduce IPV risk among men.

Highlights

  • Most previous studies have conceptualized depression as a consequence not a risk factor for intimate partner violence (IPV).[1,2] Depression, may increase the risk of IPV perpetration, as well.[3,4] Depression may predict IPV perpetration, independent of alcohol use disorder (AUD) and illicit drug use.[3]

  • Built on a risk/risk framework, this study studied how men’s poor impulse control, major depressive disorder (MDD), and Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) interact in predicting perpetration of physical IPV over time

  • Based on a model with excellent fit indices [X2 = 520.310, df = 130, P = .000, comparative fit index (CFI)=0.913, CMIN/ DF = 3.922, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.032, 90% CI = 0.032-.037] which had socioeconomic status (SES), baseline physical IPV, anxiety, and AUD in the model, MDD was only associated with change in physical IPV among individuals with poor impulse control

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Most previous studies have conceptualized depression as a consequence not a risk factor for intimate partner violence (IPV).[1,2] Depression, may increase the risk of IPV perpetration, as well.[3,4] Depression may predict IPV perpetration, independent of alcohol use disorder (AUD) and illicit drug use.[3]. We believe MDD and impulse control may have synergistic effects as IPV risk factors.[12] Most previous studies have tested additive effects of impulse control and mental health problems.[13,14,15] There is still a need to study multiplicative effects of risk factors of IPV. Built on a risk/risk framework, this study studied how men’s poor impulse control, MDD, and AUD interact in predicting perpetration of physical IPV over time. Risk-risk frameworks have been previously applied to study IPV perpetration, we could not find any previous study considering the multiplicative effects of MDD, AUD, and poor impulse control on physical IPV perpetration. Using a longitudinal design and national sample, we tested additive and multiplicative effects of MDD, AUD, and poor impulse control of male partner on changes in physical IPV reported by other partner over time

Methods
Results
17 Change in physical IPV
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call