Synchronization Performance of Fluidic Oscillator Pairs According to the Interbridge Distance

Abstract

No AccessTechnical NotesSynchronization Performance of Fluidic Oscillator Pairs According to the Interbridge DistanceHee-Soo Kwon, Hyoung Jin Lee and Tae-Seong RohHee-Soo KwonInha University, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea*Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Aerospace Engineering, 36, Gaetbeol-ro.Search for more papers by this author, Hyoung Jin LeeInha University, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea†Associate Professor, Department of Aerospace Engineering, 36, Gaetbeol-ro.Search for more papers by this author and Tae-Seong RohInha University, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea‡Professor, Department of Aerospace Engineering, 36, Gaetbeol-ro (Corresponding Author).Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:31 Jan 2022https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J061427SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Warren R. W., U.S. Patent Application “Fluid Oscillator,” US3016066A, Filed 22 Jan. 1960. Google Scholar[2] Warren R. W., U.S. Patent Application “Negative Feedback Oscillator,” US3158166A, Filed 7 Aug. 1962. Google Scholar[3] Lin J. C., Andino M. Y., Alexander M. G., Whalen E. A., Spoor M. A., Tran J. T. and Wygnanski I. J., “An Overview of Active Flow Control Enhanced Vertical Tail Technology Development,” 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA Paper 2016-0056, 2016. LinkGoogle Scholar[4] Camci C. and Herr F., “Forced Convection Heat Transfer Enhancement Using a Self-Oscillating Impinging Planar Jet,” Journal of Heat Transfer, Vol. 124, No. 4, 2002, pp. 770–782. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1471521 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[5] Hossain M. A., Arif M., Agricola L., Ameri A., Gregory J. W. and Bons J. P., “Effects of Curvature on the Performance of Sweeping Jet Impingement Heat Transfer,” 2018 AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA Paper 2018-0243, 2018. LinkGoogle Scholar[6] Wu Y., Yu S. and Zuo L., “Large Eddy Simulation Analysis of the Heat Transfer Enhancement Using Self-Oscillating Fluidic Oscillators,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 131, March 2019, pp. 463–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.11.070 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[7] Lee E. C., Cha S., Kwon H., Roh T. and Lee H. J., “A Numerical Study on the Characteristics of Air–Fuel Mixing Using a Fluidic Oscillator in Supersonic Flow Fields, Energies, Vol. 12, No. 24, 2019, p. 4758. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12244758 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[8] Raman G. and Rice E. J., “Development of Phased Twin Flip-Flop Jets,” Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, Vol. 116, No. 3, 1994, pp. 263–268. Google Scholar[9] Koklu M., U. S. Patent Application “Fluidic Oscillator Array for Synchronized Oscillating Jet Generation,” US9333517B2, Filed 6 March 2013. Google Scholar[10] Tomac M. N. and Gregory J. W., U.S. Patent Application “Frequency-Synchronized Fluidic Oscillator Array,” US20190145441, Filed 11 Oct. 2017. Google Scholar[11] Tomac M. N. and Gregory J. W., “Phase-Synchronized Fluidic Oscillator Pair,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 57, No. 2, 2019, pp. 670–681. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J057065 LinkGoogle Scholar[12] Tomac M. N. and Farbos de Luzan C., “Synchronization of a Pair of Opposed Facing Oscillators in a Side-by-Side Configuration,” International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, Vol. 84, Aug. 2020, Paper 108605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2020.108605 Google Scholar[13] Sundström E. and Tomac M. N., “Synchronization and Flow Characteristics of the Opposed Facing Oscillator Pair in Back-to-Back Configuration,” Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, Vol. 104, No. 1, 2020, pp. 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-019-00064-6 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[14] Sundström E. and Tomac M. N., “Aeroacoustic Characteristics of a Synchronized Fluidic Oscillator,” Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, Vol. 106, No. 1, 2021, pp. 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-020-00193-3 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[15] Kwon H., Lee E. C., Roh T. and Lee H. J., “Flow Oscillating Characteristics of Fluidic Oscillator Pairs Using the Interbridge Method,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 59, No. 12, 2021, pp. 5288–5300. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J060629 LinkGoogle Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byInfluence of jet parameters of fluidic oscillator-type fuel injector on the mixing performance in a supersonic flow fieldAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 134Device for creating a pair of anti-phase-synchronized high-frequency flapping jetsSensors and Actuators A: Physical, Vol. 341 What's Popular Volume 60, Number 5May 2022 CrossmarkInformationCopyright © 2022 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the eISSN 1533-385X to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. TopicsAerodynamicsAeronautical EngineeringAeronauticsCombustion ChambersCombustorsComputational Fluid DynamicsEnergyFluid DynamicsFluid Flow PropertiesFuel InjectionIgnition SystemsRocket EngineRocketryVortex Dynamics KeywordsFeedback LoopReynolds Averaged Navier StokesMach NumberSweep AngleComputational Fluid DynamicsFlow CharacteristicsFuel InjectionCombustorsVorticesAcknowledgmentThis work was supported by Inha University Research Grant (2021).PDF Received3 November 2021Accepted24 December 2021Published online31 January 2022