Abstract

Defining neuronal cell types and their associated biophysical and synaptic diversity has become an important goal in neuroscience as a mechanism to create comprehensive brain cell atlases in the post-genomic age. Beyond broad classification such as neurotransmitter expression, interneuron vs. pyramidal, sensory or motor, the field is still in the early stages of understanding closely related cell types. In both vertebrate and invertebrate nervous systems, one well-described distinction related to firing characteristics and synaptic release properties are tonic and phasic neuronal subtypes. In vertebrates, these classes were defined based on sustained firing responses during stimulation (tonic) vs. transient responses that rapidly adapt (phasic). In crustaceans, the distinction expanded to include synaptic release properties, with tonic motoneurons displaying sustained firing and weaker synapses that undergo short-term facilitation to maintain muscle contraction and posture. In contrast, phasic motoneurons with stronger synapses showed rapid depression and were recruited for short bursts during fast locomotion. Tonic and phasic motoneurons with similarities to those in crustaceans have been characterized in Drosophila, allowing the genetic toolkit associated with this model to be used for dissecting the unique properties and plasticity mechanisms for these neuronal subtypes. This review outlines general properties of invertebrate tonic and phasic motoneurons and highlights recent advances that characterize distinct synaptic and plasticity pathways associated with two closely related glutamatergic neuronal cell types that drive invertebrate locomotion.

Highlights

  • With few exceptions, every cell in an animal has the same gene set encoded in their chromosomal DNA

  • We focus our discussion on the motor system, it is worth noting that neurons with tonic and phasic properties have been described in other brain regions

  • The best characterized forms of homeostatic plasticity at Drosophila neuromuscular junctions (NMJs) occur either through a chronic pathway following genetic disruption of post-synaptic glutamate receptor function or via acute mechanisms following pharmaceutical blockage of glutamate receptors (Petersen et al, 1997; Davis et al, 1998; Frank et al, 2006; Younger et al, 2013; Wang et al, 2014; Kiragasi et al, 2017). This process is known as presynaptic homeostatic potentiation (PHP) and requires retrograde signals from the muscle to trigger a compensatory enhancement in the number of synaptic vesicles (SVs) released that brings neurotransmission back to baseline levels (Frank, 2014)

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Every cell in an animal has the same gene set encoded in their chromosomal DNA. Thousands of individual cell types are found in the brain, each forming connections with many other neurons. This developmental feat gives rise to a biological machine that processes external stimuli and combines it with internal motivation states and prior experiences to guide ongoing. How neurons create unique functional and structural identities and still allow flexible changes to occur during states of plasticity is a fundamental question in neuroscience. Deciphering these fundamental questions in neuronal diversity and connectivity will empower broad efforts in neuroscience to understand how the brain is built and how it functions. We describe recent advances in understanding the diversity of these neuronal subclasses and look toward the future at potential approaches to generate a more detailed view of the key molecular engines that drive biophysical and synaptic heterogeneity

OVERVIEW OF TONIC AND PHASIC NEURONAL SUBTYPES
STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION OF INVERTEBRATE TONIC AND PHASIC MOTONEURONS
High Pr Depression
DISTINCT SYNAPTIC PLASTICITY MECHANISMS FOR TONIC AND PHASIC MOTONEURONS
Findings
CONCLUSION AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call