Abstract

The squirmer model of Lighthill and Blake has been widely used to analyse swimming ciliates. However, real ciliates are covered by hair-like organelles, called cilia; the differences between the squirmer model and real ciliates remain unclear. Here, we developed a ciliate model incorporating the distinct ciliary apparatus, and analysed motion using a boundary element–slender-body coupling method. This methodology allows us to accurately calculate hydrodynamic interactions between cilia and the cell body under free-swimming conditions. Results showed that an antiplectic metachronal wave was optimal in the swimming speed with various cell-body aspect ratios, which is consistent with former theoretical studies. Exploiting oblique wave propagation, we reproduced a helical trajectory, likeParamecium, although the cell body was spherical. We confirmed that the swimming velocity of model ciliates was well represented by the squirmer model. However, squirmer modelling outside the envelope failed to estimate the energy costs of swimming; over 90 % of energy was dissipated inside the ciliary envelope. The optimal swimming efficiency was given by the antiplectic wave; the value was 6.7 times larger than in-phase beating. Our findings provide a fundamental basis for modelling swimming micro-organisms.

Highlights

  • Swimming micro-organisms are ubiquitous, including oceanic micro-algae and human gut bacteria

  • We developed a ciliate model using the slender-body–boundary integral coupling method

  • We found that an antiplectic metachronal wave of wavenumber k = 1.0 optimised the swimming speed when the cellular body assumed various aspect ratios

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Swimming micro-organisms are ubiquitous, including oceanic micro-algae and human gut bacteria. The squirmer model describes fluid motions outside the ciliary envelope; flow inside the envelope is ignored. The waves exhibited flow-induced emergence; development of an antiplectic metachronal wave increased the propulsion velocity by more than 3–10-fold compared to in-phase beating. Earlier studies on squirmers and cilia-driven flow yielded valuable insights into the dynamics of swimming ciliates and the propulsion velocity of metachronal waves, their relationship remains unclear, especially the difference between swimming mediated by surface squirming and ciliary motions. We develop a three-dimensional ciliate model incorporating individual ciliary motions on cell surfaces.

Boundary integral equation with slender-body theory
Ciliary motions
Boundary element method
Parameter setting
Spherical ciliates featuring in-phase ciliary beating
Effect of metachronal wave
Effect of aspect ratio
Effect of cilia numbers
Helical swimming with an oblique metachronal wave
Swimming velocity
Energy dissipation
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call