Suture Slippage During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Passage Is Significantly Lower Using a Krackow Suture

Abstract

PurposeTo compare the suture slippage on a hamstring tendon graft prepared with a modified finger-trap device (SPEEDTRAP) with one prepared with Krackow stitch during graft passage through the tibial tunnel in ACL reconstruction.MethodsThirty-eight patients underwent anatomic triple-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with 2 femoral and 3 tibial tunnels. After semitendinosus tendon was cut in half to make 2 grafts, the free ends of the proximal membranous portion (posterolateral [PL] graft) were prepared together with 2 sutures: (1) one SPEEDTRAP and one Krackow stitch for 20 cases (group A) and (2) double Krackow stitches on both sides for 18 cases (group B). Then, the PL graft was dye-marked at the proximal suture of SPEEDTRAP in group A and Krackow suture in group B and was inserted into the joint via tibial tunnel ahead of the loop side. The distance between the mark on the graft and the proximal suture of SPEEDTRAP or Krackow stitch was measured under arthroscopy after graft fixation at femur. Slippage was defined as 1 mm and more of distance between the mark and the proximal suture.ResultsSlippage was observed in 16 cases for SPEEDTRAP and in 2 for Krackow suture in group A, whereas one case showed slippage in group B. The slippage distance was 4.0 ± 2.9 mm for SPEEDTRAP and 0.2 ± 0.5 mm for Krackow stitch in group A (P < .001), whereas it was 0.1 ± 0.2 mm for double Krackow stitch in group B, showing a significant difference from SPEEDTRAP suture (P < .001).ConclusionsAt the time of PL graft passage through the tibial tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, there was significantly less slippage observed with the Krackow stitch compared with the SPEEDTRAP stitch.Level of EvidenceLevel IV, therapeutic case series.