Sustentaculum fracture fixation with lateral plate or medial screw fixation are equivalent

Abstract

BackgroundFixation of sustentaculum tali fractures is important to maintain the biomechanical function of the subtalar joint. A common method of fixation is securing the sustentacular fragment by way of a laterally based locking plate (LP). A medial approach with a single screw (MS) has been proposed as an alternative method of fixation. MethodsFive pairs of formalin-preserved cadaveric ankles with the subtalar joint and interosseous ligaments intact (“osseous cadavers”) and four pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric ankles with soft-tissue preserved dissected from mid-tibia down (“soft tissue cadavers”) were used in the study. The left ankle was randomly assigned to one of the two fixation methods (LP or MS), while the right ankle was the opposite. These same steps for fixation were repeated for six synthetic ankle models. All models were loaded with a body mass of 80 kg. Statistical differences between LP and MS stiffness were determined using a paired t-test in cadavers and un-paired t-tests in synthetic ankles. ResultsFor osseous cadaveric ankles, LP demonstrated a mean stiffness of 232.95(SD: 59.96) N/mm, while MS was 239.72(SD:131.09) N/mm (p = 0.9293). For soft tissue cadaveric ankles, LP mean stiffness was 133.58(SD:37.84) N/mm, while MS was 134.88(SD:20.75) N/mm (p = 0.9578). For synthetic ankles, LP mean stiffness was 220.40(SD:81.93) N/mm, while MS was 261.50(SD:100.21) N/mm (p = 0.6116). ConclusionsAcross all three models, there was no significant difference between LP and MS methods. Retrospective observational studies are recommended to assess patient outcomes from each of the methods.