Abstract

The rubber hand illusion is a perceptual illusion in which participants experience an inanimate rubber hand as their own when they observe this model hand being stroked in synchrony with strokes applied to the person’s real hand, which is hidden. Earlier studies have focused on the factors that determine the elicitation of this illusion, the relative contribution of vision, touch and other sensory modalities involved and the best ways to quantify this perceptual phenomenon. Questionnaires serve to assess the subjective feeling of ownership, whereas proprioceptive drift is a measure of the recalibration of hand position sense towards the rubber hand when the illusion is induced. Proprioceptive drift has been widely used and thought of as an objective measure of the illusion, although the relationship between this measure and the subjective illusion is not fully understood. Here, we examined how long the illusion is maintained after the synchronous visuotactile stimulation stops with the specific aim of clarifying the temporal relationship in the reduction of both subjective ownership and proprioceptive drift. Our results show that both the feeling of ownership and proprioceptive drift are sustained for tens of seconds after visuotactile stroking has ceased. Furthermore, our results indicate that the reduction of proprioceptive drift and the feeling of ownership follow similar time courses in their reduction, suggesting that the two phenomena are temporally correlated. Collectively, these findings help us better understand the relationships of multisensory stimulation, subjective ownership, and proprioceptive drift in the rubber hand illusion.

Highlights

  • The rubber hand illusion is a perceptual illusion in which participants experience an inanimate rubber hand as their own (Botvinick and Cohen 1998)

  • The first step of the analysis indicates that the subjective feeling of ownership persists for up to 300 s after the end of the visuo-tactile stimulation, whereas the proprioceptive drift is no longer significantly different between the synchronous and asynchronous after 40 s

  • In the second step of the analysis, we show that the proprioceptive drift and the subjective rating display a similar time course with decreasing values over time with similar slopes and half times of their fitted exponential decay curves

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The rubber hand illusion is a perceptual illusion in which participants experience an inanimate rubber hand as their own (Botvinick and Cohen 1998). We showed that experimentally manipulating the physical location of the participants’ real hand during the induction of the rubber hand illusion without the participant noticing caused changes in the proprioceptive drift but did not change the subjective ratings of the illusion (Abdulkarim and Ehrsson 2016). This observation speaks against proprioceptive drift being a causal factor in generating the rubber hand illusion, but the subjective illusion could still cause proprioceptive drift, and the two could be correlated

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call