Abstract

Although the carbon emission trading regulation proves its advantage of reducing abatement costs, the timing of operating activities makes overage or shortage of allocated emission allowances quickly happen in single-year compliance, thus increasing abatement costs. The provision of inter-period emission credits banking and borrowing in a multi-period compliance phase can give emitters flexibility in emission compliance, which practices world-widely. In this study, we investigate the impact of carbon trading with inter-temporal emission credits borrowing and banking on a production–inventory–distribution system’s supply chain network decision-making and its compliance strategies by proposing a novel two-stage stochastic programming. A scenario-based robust optimization approach is presented with a post-optimization stage to obtain robustness-profit-environment balanced decision-making considering uncertain demand and stochastic carbon-trading price. The results suggests emitters should adopt specific greener techniques to reduce related emissions with priority under carbon-trading policies. The results also show the provision of carbon credits borrowing and banking has a positive influence on enhancing the efficiency in supply chain economic and ecological performance. Besides, given the flexible provisions, the manager can reallocate emission credits according to its business’s operation, and transfer more emission credits to periods of higher carbon-trading price. This findings also suggest banking in early periods instead of carelessly borrowing from future, for uncertainty in future business might make it harder or impossible to comply with emission regulation at last. To regulators, it should prevent borrowing explicitly or allow it only to a limited extent.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call