Abstract
Research of urgent problems and new aspects of contemporary tendencies in architect education of the preservation of cultural heritage in Lithuania has been carried out by the team of Department of Architectural Fundamentals, Theory and Arts, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University. Within the framework of the Sustainable Rehabilitation of the Historic Towns in Europe” (SURE), project funded by EU with the collaboration among the Polish, Italian, Spanish and Lithuanian counterparts, Vilnius team has performed the research on the problems in emerging tendencies in the highest education on the preservation of the cultural heritage in Lithuania. The questionnaires for the opinion pooling were sent to the selected threefold type of the recipients: educational-scientific, public-state, and private-professional (Best Practices Handbook 2017). The research of enquire reflected devastating effect of recent processes of urban planning in Lithuania in the immovable cultural heritage area: neglect of cultural landscape value in urban planning of cities, concern of identity loss and negative impact of globalization, lack of proper maintenance and use of historic buildings. Contrary to these revealed problems plea of recent international strategic documents emphasize variety of ways of contribution of historic areas in bettering of urban life. Lack of ecological approach in urban heritage planning, tension between contents of academic programs and official aims of strategic documents ratified by the State, difference in expectations of theoreticians and practicing urban planners were revealed by the results of completed research. The differences in attitudes of academicians and professionals, i.e. inadequate reflection of urban heritage in urban planning processes, shortcomings in integrating of local communities into preservation processes and academic education of architects were clearly stated. Variety of important issues in relation with protection of cultural heritage and sustainability was unveiled in academic education of architects in Lithuania. Provided questionnaires and collected results of the answers, after the completed analysis of the education programs and expert survey disclosed the shortage of ecological knowledge in the field of cultural heritage protection. Considering revealed problems and needs integration of sustainability and urban heritage preservation should be proposed as one of major target for the improvement of existing educational system of architects in Lithuania. Primarily targets to be hit by the alteration of the situation would be the reduction of the lack of ecological approach in urban heritage planning, diminished tension between contents of academic programs and official aims of strategic documents ratified by State and lowered difference in expectations among the theoreticians and practicing urban planners. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.sace.21.4.19178
Highlights
Contemporary urban development in Lithuania is often associated with disregard for urban cultural heritage
One is dealing with actual situation, asking respondents about the issues and problems related to heritage protection and revitalization of historical towns that are taught on architectural studies, what qualifications architects have in the field, to characterize the general approach to heritage protection, tell the positive and negative remarks on current education of architects in the field
2017/4/21 anism of their implementation, responsibility of participants, role of local inhabitants and communities in urban development and heritage protection are still indeterminate in Lithuanian legal system
Summary
Contemporary urban development in Lithuania is often associated with disregard for urban cultural heritage. Many aspects of these negative phenomena could be related with existing system of architect education; no systematic research was accomplished from this point of view during the last decades. Substantial number of urgent aspects of contemporary tendencies in architect education in relation with preservation of cultural heritage were revealed. The major aim of the research was to generalize the results of expert valuation, and by naming the key problems of architects’ education, and to propose the structure and the contents of new master program framework. After final evaluation of basic problems in practice of urban heritage protection and academic education the proposals for new master program were drafted
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
