Abstract

BackgroundThis study employs multi-segment foot modeling (MSFM) to examine flatfoot reconstruction among ambulatory children with cerebral palsy (CP).Research Question: Does flatfoot reconstruction improve MSFM measures, physical examination and radiographic variables for forefoot varus and midfoot collapse and associated multi-planar compensatory features? MethodsMSFM was performed preoperatively and postoperatively in a cohort of ambulatory CP patients undergoing flatfoot reconstruction (surgical group, n = 24). A comparison group of non-surgical group of ambulatory CP patients with pes planovalgus (flatfoot) who did not undergo flatfoot reconstruction was also identified (n = 17). All patients in this comparison group underwent MSFM at two separate time points. Physical examination was performed and standing AP and lateral foot radiographs were obtained during each gait analysis session. ResultsPatients in the surgical group had improvement in their forefoot varus deformity, as documented on physical examination and kinematics in the STJN position of the foot and ankle, as well as in the compensatory hindfoot eversion and midfoot abduction during stance phase of gait. Furthermore, patients in the surgical group had improvement in midfoot collapse as identified kinematically by midfoot dorsiflexion, physical examination descriptors of midfoot position, and radiographic measures of calcaneal pitch and AP and lateral talar-first metatarsal angle. Patients in the non-surgical comparison group did not demonstrate these changes. SignificanceImprovements in foot motion after flatfoot reconstruction in ambulatory CP patients were identified by MSFM, physical examination measures, and radiographs. Patients in the surgical and non-surgical groups had similar pre-operative radiographic findings, suggesting that physical examination and MSFM data were important in the surgical decision making process. Finally, surgical intervention did not fully restore normal foot kinematic, physical examination, and radiographic parameters, which suggests that a different, perhaps more aggressive, surgical approach for flatfoot reconstruction is needed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.