Abstract

ObjectivesWe investigated whether surgical skill and procedure were related to oncological outcomes in cervical cancer patients who underwent Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy (LRH). MethodsWe previously assessed data of LRH from 251 patients with FIGO stage (2009) IA2, IB1and IIA1 cervical cancer collected for JGOG 1081s study. 1) The JGOG 1081s cohort study was re-examined to refine the surgical details and extend the follow-up period as chart review. 2) Unedited videos for recurrent cases and matched non-recurrent control cases were newly compared by experts for various surgical skills and surgical procedures using the modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) tool, without awareness of the recurrence status as video review. ResultsAfter a median follow-up of 46 months, tumors had recurred in 31 of the 251 patients. The five-year Recurrence-Free Survival rate was 86.9% (81.8–90.6) and five-year Overall Survival rate was 93.7% (87.5–96.8). Multivariate analysis from chart reviews found that an experience with LRH of less than 20 cases per institution was an independent prognostic factor for recurrence (Hazard Ratio (HR) 2.49, 95%CI 1.12–5.53, p = 0.025). For the surgical video review, we compared 23 videos of recurrent cases with 23 background-matched non-recurrent controls. Lower modified OSATS scores from the video review were consistently trended to have a higher risk of recurrence. ConclusionsOur new study has found that LRH surgical experience and skill trended to have better oncological outcomes.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call