The impact of estrogen receptor and L1 cell adhesion molecule expression on endometrial cancer outcome correlates with clinicopathological risk group and molecular subgroup

Abstract

ObjectiveTo assess the risk stratification of clinicopathologically and molecularly classified endometrial cancer based on estrogen receptor (ER) and L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) expression. MethodsThis was a retrospective study of patients who underwent primary treatment at a single tertiary center. Carcinomas were classified into 5 clinicopathological risk groups, as per European guidelines. Immunohistochemistry and polymerase-ϵ sequencing were conducted for molecular classification and determination of ER and L1CAM expression. ResultsData from 1044 patients were analyzed. The median follow-up was 67.5 months. In univariable analyses, ER expression correlated with improved disease-specific survival (DSS) in the “no specific molecular profile” (NSMP) (P < 0.001) and mismatch repair deficient (MMRd) (P = 0.002) subgroups. Negative L1CAM expression was associated with enhanced DSS in the NSMP subgroup alone (P < 0.001). ER (hazard ratio [HR] 0.18), but not L1CAM, exhibited prognostic significance within NSMP when controlling for parameters available at the time of diagnosis (tumor histotype, grade, age). ER and L1CAM were not independently associated with DSS within NSMP when controlling for parameters available after surgery (clinicopathological risk groups, age, adjuvant therapy). However, in high-risk–advanced-metastatic cases, both ER (HR 0.26) and L1CAM (HR 3.9) independently correlated with DSS. Similarly, within MMRd, ER was associated with improved DSS in high-risk–advanced-metastatic carcinomas (HR 0.42). ConclusionThe prognostic significance of ER and L1CAM varies across clinicopathological risk groups and molecular subgroups of endometrial cancer. Notably, risk assessment for high-risk–advanced-metastatic NSMP and MMRd subtype carcinomas can be refined by ER status.