Abstract
Purpose: The use of virtual surgical planning in head and neck surgery is growing strongly. In the literature, its validity, accuracy and clinical utility for mandibular reconstruction are widely documented. Virtual planning of surgical bone resection and reconstruction takes place several days before surgery and its very sensitive nature can negatively affect an intervention aimed at maximum precision in term of oncological safety.Methods: The study focuses on a retrospective evaluation of the surgical margins in 26 consecutive cases with oral cavity malignancy and who underwent computer-assisted mandibular resection/reconstruction guided by the different types of bone, periosteal and peri-mandibular tissue involvement. The goal was to analyze the strategic and technical aspects useful to minimize the risk of positive or close margins and to vary the reconstructive strategy in the case of intraoperative findings of a non-radical planned resection.Results: No intraoperative or perioperative complications occurred. In 20 patients, virtual surgical planning permitted mandibular reconstruction to be performed using composite fibular free flaps, characterized by high accuracy and negative bone margins. In the remaining 6 patients, also virtually planned but otherwise reconstructed due to poor general condition (advanced age, severe comorbidity), negative bone margins were obtained. Intraoperative enlargement of the resection was carried out in one case and positive soft tissue margins were observed in another case.Conclusion: The results were satisfactory in terms of oncological radicality and precision. The functional benefits and reduction in operating times, previously demonstrated in other articles also by the authors, seem to justify the side effects related to the risk of modifying the planned surgery. During virtual planning, the surgeons must bear in mind that an unexpected progression of the tumor or a limited planned resection will entail modifying the extent of the resection intraoperatively and nullifying the virtual planning on which the reconstruction was based. Further investigations are necessary to clarify all aspects of virtual surgical planning in this setting.
Highlights
Surgery represents the first-choice therapy for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC)
The clinical significance of surgical margins on both bone and oral mucosa has always aroused great scientific interest [4] and are a consistent prognostic factor [5]; adequate resection margins in OCSCC lead to a higher rate of survival and an important reduction in local recurrence [1], while inadequate resection results in the need for adjuvant therapy
A retrospective study was carried out on the use of virtual surgical planning, using the computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction (CAMR) technique, repositioning technique (REP-TECH) and computer-assisted rim mandibulectomy (CARM) or stereolithographic models in the reconstruction of patients affected by squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity who were submitted to segmental or rim-mandibulectomy and primary reconstruction with a free flap
Summary
Surgery represents the first-choice therapy for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC). The clinical significance of surgical margins on both bone and oral mucosa has always aroused great scientific interest [4] and are a consistent prognostic factor [5]; adequate resection margins in OCSCC lead to a higher rate of survival and an important reduction in local recurrence [1], while inadequate resection results in the need for adjuvant therapy. Virtual resection/reconstruction planning (computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction—CAMR) [9, 10] has established itself as an effective technique to reduce operating times and achieve millimeter precision in modeling the revascularized bone replacing the mandible. The design process takes place several days before surgery This is a sensitive procedure that can negatively affect an intervention aiming for maximum precision, made more difficult due to the added risk of planning an incomplete resection, resulting in positive or close margins. Additional more indepth knowledge is required regarding the safety of the procedure in terms of surgical margins, especially at the bone level
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.