Surfactant Enhanced Oil Recovery from Tight Carbonates: Core-Scale Experiments to Reservoir-Scale Modeling

Abstract

Abstract Most carbonate reservoirs are oil-wet/mixed-wet and heterogenous at multiple scales. Majority of the injected water flows through the high permeability regions/fractures and bypass the oil in the matrix due the high negative capillary pressure (Pc). To enhance oil recovery from such reservoirs, the sign of the Pc should be changed by wettability alteration (WA) or the Pc should be reduced by lowering interfacial tension (IFT). In this study, surfactants which can either alter wettability or develop ultra-low IFT were identified through laboratory measurements for the target carbonate reservoir. The performance of these two types of surfactants was systematically evaluated at the core scale and scaled-up to the reservoir scale. A reservoir-scale model was developed to simulate injection-soak-production (ISP) tests and evaluate performance of the selected surfactants at the field scale. Experiments showed that quaternary ammonium cationic surfactants have excellent WA ability, while a series of propoxy sulfate anionic surfactants showed intermediate WA and ultra-low IFT. Spontaneous imbibition tests showed that WA surfactants have fast initial oil production, while ultra-low IFT surfactants has low initial oil rate but higher final oil recovery, which was validated by mechanistic simulation. Low IFT results in low Pc and slow imbibition, but also triggers gravity-driven drainage. For ultra-low IFT system, gravity drainage is more dominant than WA, and Pc-alteration is less important than relative permeability (Kr) alteration. As reservoir thickness increases, Kr-alteration is more important than Pc-alteration. Gravity drainage is expected to be scaled up by length of matrix (L), while Pc-driven imbibition is scaled by L2. Field-scale simulation showed that low-IFT surfactant has better injectivity than WA surfactant during injection phase. In soaking phase, spontaneous imbibition by WA surfactant is much more significant than that by low-IFT surfactant. In production phase, post-waterflood achieved higher oil recovery from low-IFT surfactant treated matrix due to its low residual oil saturation and high oil relative permeability.