Abstract
By means of comparing the VHCF response of heat-treated alloy steel, several factors governing the transition from surface (type I) to internal (type II) VHCF failure, and, in the case of internal inclusion and non-inclusion type II VHCF failure, are discussed: differences in strength, differences in grain size and strength gradients. Therefore, the steel grades (i) 50CrMo4 (0.5 wt%C–1.0 wt%Cr–0.2 wt%Mo) in two different tempering conditions (37HRC and 57HRC) but of the same prior austenite grain size, and (ii) 16MnCrV7 7 (0.16 wt%C–1.25 wt%Mn–1.7 wt%Cr) in the bainitic and martensitic thermomechanical treatment state, were studied. It is concluded that steels of moderate strength (37HRC) exhibit a real endurance limit (109 cycles), while the fatigue strength of high strength (43–57HRC) or coarse-grained steels (37HRC) decreases with increasing number of load cycles.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call