Abstract

Binocular disparity signals can provide high acuity information about the positions of points, surfaces, and objects in three-dimensional space. For some stimulus configurations, however, perceived depth is known to be affected by surface organization. Here we examine the effects of surface continuity and discontinuity on such surface organization biases. Participants were presented with a series of random dot surfaces, each with a cumulative Gaussian form in depth. Surfaces varied in the steepness of disparity gradients, via manipulation of the standard deviation of the Gaussian, and/or the presence of differing forms of surface discontinuity. By varying the relative disparity between surface edges, we measured the points of subjective equality, where surfaces of differing steepness and/or discontinuity were perceptually indistinguishable. We compare our results to a model that considers sensitivity to different frequencies of disparity modulation. Across a series of experiments, the observed patterns of change in points of subjective equality suggest that perceived depth is determined by the integration of measures of relative disparity, with a bias toward sharp changes in disparity. Such disparities increase perceived depth when they are in the same direction as the overall disparity. Conversely, perceived depth is reduced by the presence of sharp disparity changes that oppose the sign of the overall depth change.

Highlights

  • Data for each surface standard deviation were fitted to a decreasing cumulative Gaussian, with the 0.5 threshold—the point of subjective equality (PSE)—extracted

  • The reduction in perceived depth for surfaces with larger standard deviations were greater when there was a gap in the stimulus, than when this gap was filled with a frontoparallel plane

  • While an increase of surface steepness leads to a decrease in perceived depth, the effects of surface discontinuity manipulations depend critically on discontinuity structure

Read more

Summary

Introduction

An extensive body of physiological and computational work suggests that the perception of depth from binocular disparity is derived from a dense map of disparity measurements, encoded in retinal coordinates at the early stages of visual cortex (DeAngelis, Ohzawa,& Freeman, 1991; Fleet, Wagner, & Heeger, 1996; Goncalves & Welchman, 2017; Nienborg, Bridge, Parker, & Cumming, 2004; Ohzawa, DeAngelis, & Freeman, 1990; Prince, Cumming, & Parker, 2002; Qian & Zhu, 1997; Read & Cumming, 2007). Researchers have shown that the perception of quantitative depth in binocular stimuli depends upon surrounding disparity information, with the presence of continuous gradations in disparity resulting in a reduction in perceived depth (Cammack & Harris, 2016; Deas & Wilcox, 2014, 2015; Hornsey, Hibbard, & Scarfe, 2016) These recent findings are consistent with much earlier results, which showed that disparity discrimination thresholds are increased for pairs of vertical lines when intervening horizontal lines create a closed figure (McKee, 1983; Mitchison & Westheimer, 1984). Such thresholds are reduced for random-dot stereograms (RDSs) of curved surfaces containing gaps between surface segments (Vreven, McKee, & Verghese, 2002). Deas and Wilcox (2014, 2015) suggested that these reductions in perceived depth were due to the effects of Gestalt grouping

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call