Abstract

This article shows, using Michelet and Quinet as examples, how two men of humanistic education, nourished on Latin literature, developed a great distrust of Latin itself. The reasons are predominantly political; the anti-clerical struggle against the Catholic Church and the fear of empires (the second French Empire being compared to the Roman Empire) prevail over the model of the Roman Republic. Thus, contrary to what has sometimes been said, a certain kind of humanistic thinking, developed around the middle of the 19th century, instigated a general tendency, which, during the second half of the century, evolved into systems of higher education without the teaching of Latin.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.