Abstract

In this study, we propose to analyze the migratory character of ideas evoked by Arthur Lovejoy and the evolution of the image of Mary Magdalene in the light of two fundamental theories of intellectual history: the Warburgian iconology and the concept of “care of self” theorized by Michel Foucault in The History of Sexuality. Although these two notions are different by the nature of their horizon of study, they are similar by the importance given to historical heritage in the redefinition of a cultural identity (individual or collective) and by the anthropological exhumation of ancient references which survive and are transmitted in social memory, thus allowing the reinterpretation of certain motifs and symbols of the Christian religion. Inseparable from the image of the Greek goddess Aphrodite of which she is the Christian counterpart, and also the concrete representation bringing together all the ancient attributes unearthed along a vast iconographic history, Mary Magdalene goes beyond “primary opacity to oneself” which characterized her before the encounter with Jesus to respond to the double structure of questioning which governs its emergence. Indeed, its image is shaped both by the reactivation of latent potentialities bogged down in the ritual action of the “intermediate forms” that come under iconology, and by access to a form of truth made possible by the exchange with divinity.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.