Abstract

ABSTRACT Enhanced bioremediation strategies employ intensive electron donor amendments that can be successful in generating high biomass concentrations within the targeted area, and this technology is increasingly being applied within source zones to address non–aqueous phase contaminants. An unintended consequence is potential electron donor recycling via the slow endogenous decay of these newly grown cells, which may persist in the source zone even after the enhanced bioremediation project is completed and the introduced electron donor is exhausted. This paper presents a conceptual model that outlines the endogenous decay process within source zones and identifies several key scenarios where it is an important contributor to long-term attenuation. A key concept is that this reservoir represented by decaying biomass is both potentially large and capable of several rounds of turnover before becoming exhausted. Thus, the slow decay of biomass and the recycling of these decay products within the source zone extended the duration of the treatment period. A recent survey on the performance of source depletion technologies strongly suggests that this process is being observed at sites where enhanced bioremediation has been implemented (McGuire et al., 2006, Ground Water Monitor. Remediat. 26:73–84). Concentrations continued to decline several years after treatment, providing a strong indication that there is an endogenous electron donor supply that is contributing to continued contaminant reduction over time. Little evidence of concentration rebound was observed relative to sites where other technologies were used, suggesting long-term benefits associated with enhanced bioremediation that appear to partially offset processes that can contribute to rebound (e.g., matrix diffusion). Because initial colonization can occur near the non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL)-water interface when exogenous electron donor is readily available the endogenous cell decay occurs in an optimal location to continue to support reductive dechlorination. This electron donor recycling process is ideally suited to favor growth of dechlorinating organisms relative to competing populations because of the slow release rates associated with decay, and it should preferentially stimulate polychloroethylene (PCE) and trichloroethylene (TCE) source removal over metabolites. Endogenous decay can be directly employed as part of the remediation design through groundwater recirculation or by the construction of a carbon-based in situ biowall to generate large amounts of biomass. In the case of an in situ biowall, a key consideration is the placement, either as a permeable reactive barrier filled with fermentable carbon within the source zone, or as a barrier located upgradient of a source zone to ensure that groundwater is reduced before entering the targeted area. Regardless of the approach, the likely impact of electron donor recycling through endogenous decay is to extend low-level activity for up to several years, making enhanced bioremediation a promising technology in terms of initial performance and for long-term polishing.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call