Abstract
In the previous contribution and in the reply to the discussion justice was not done to several points.It was made clear that a circulation of air was established round the airscrew at standstill, creating a certain velocity before the airscrew disc in such a way as to modify fundamentally the thrust on the blades. But it was not explicitly stated that at full speed (of the aeroplane) this component of velocity was ignored altogether and each blade was assumed to be attacking “ still ” air.This does not mean that the air was still until the blade actually drew level with it, for, if the analogy with lifting surfaces holds, we know that at a distance of twice the chord width in front of the blade the air is appreciably disturbed, and this disturbance may be by no means negligible even at four or five times the chord's width in front of the instantaneous position of the blade.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.