Supine versus lateral position for total hip replacement: accuracy of biomechanical reconstruction.

Abstract

Restoration of normal hip anatomy and biomechanics is a key surgical goal for success in total hip arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence, if any, that patient positioning in the supine and lateral decubitus positions has in achieving this goal. A single center multi-surgeon case-matched series from a tertiary level referral center of patients undergoing primary unilateral THA for osteoarthritis between April 2018 and December 2019 was retrospectively analyzed. Patients (n = 200) were divided into two matched groups: supine (anterior approach, n = 100) and lateral decubitus (direct lateral or posterior/SuperPATH™ approaches, n = 100). Post-operative anteroposterior pelvic radiographs were analyzed using a previously validated software (SurgiMap, Nemaris Inc., USA) for parameters of reconstruction of the hip in the coronal plane; leg length discrepancy, vertical and horizontal displacement of the center of rotation, femoral offset, and total offset. Mean absolute leg length discrepancy in the supine group was 0.6 ± 3.3mm (95% [CI] -0.1 to 1.2mm) versus 2.4 ± 3.8mm (95% [CI] 1.6 to 3.1) in the lateral decubitus position (p < 0.001). The center of rotation was displaced medially by a mean of 3.2 ± 2.7mm in the supine group versus 1.3 ± 4.0mm in the lateral decubitus group (p < 0.001). For a surgical target of reconstructing both leg length and total offset within 5mm of native anatomy, the supine group was more than twice as likely to achieve these goals with fewer outliers (OR 2.631, 95% [CI] 1.901-3.643) (76% v 30%, p < 0.001). Total hip arthroplasty through the anterior approach in the supine position is more consistent and accurate for the restoration of leg length and total offset. Further study is required to assess how this translates with outcome. III-retrospective cohort study.