Abstract

Supersymmetry, originally proposed in particle physics, refers to a dual relation that connects fermionic and bosonic degrees of freedom in a system. Recently, there has been considerable interest in applying the idea of supersymmetry to topological phases, motivated by the attempt to gain insights from the fermion side into the boson side and vice versa. We present a systematic study of this construction when applied to band topology in noninteracting systems. First, on top of the conventional ten-fold way, we find that topological insulators and superconductors are divided into three classes depending on whether the supercharge can be local and symmetric, must break a symmetry to preserve locality, or needs to break locality. Second, we resolve the apparent paradox between the nontriviality of free fermions and the triviality of free bosons by noting that the topological information is encoded in the identification map. We also discuss how to understand a recently revealed supersymmetric entanglement duality in this context. These findings are illustrated by prototypical examples. Our work sheds new light on band topology from the perspective of supersymmetry.

Highlights

  • Supersymmetric (SUSY) models play an important role in physics

  • We should impose the locality such that hf,b(k) is a smooth map from T d ≡ (2π R/Z)d to a matrix space constrained by the gap condition and symmetries

  • We have examined the role of topology in the SUSY construction of quadratic fermion and boson Hamiltonians

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Perhaps the most well-known is their use in relativistic quantum field theories, where they resolve a number of theoretical problems [1]. It is a powerful tool in the analysis of disordered systems [6] or to solve an array of problems in quantum and statistical physics [7]. The idea of SUSY has been applied to extract the topological indices of free-boson systems, such as photonic and magnonic crystals, from their free-fermion counterparts [16–19]. This strategy works well for individual bands, which may still be nontrivial despite the fact that the ground state of free bosons is always trivial [20]. The entanglement problem gets resolved as the SUSY map, called the identification map, can lead to very strong squeezing, if it is locality preserving

SUSY BANDS
TOPOLOGICAL OBSTRUCTION FROM LOCALITY AND SYMMETRY
IDENTIFICATION MAP AND ENTANGLEMENT DUALITY
EXAMPLES
DISCUSSIONS
SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK
Supercharge
BdG Hamiltonians
General construction
Strictly local and symmetric constructions for chiral symmetry classes
Strictly local and asymmetric constructions for classes AI and AII
Local and symmetric
Local but asymmetric
Nonlocal

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.