Abstract

Referee: Dr. Paul Hooykass, Institut of Molecular Plant Sciences, Leiden University, Clusius Laboratory, Wassenaarseweg 64, 2333, Al Leiden, NetherlandsRecent reports suggest the transfer of superfluous DNA sequences to plant genomes during transformation processes. This review investigates the evidence from the published literature for the prevalence of this phenomenon and highlights methods to limit or prevent DNA transfer and subsequent potentially detrimental evolutionary consequences.Evidence for superfluous foreign DNA transfer using both Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and direct DNA transfer methods such as microprojectile bombardment and PEG-mediated transformation of protoplasts is reported. In the case of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, the lack of information on the integration of sequences from outside of the T-DNA borders has been due to the general belief by researchers that T-DNA processing is precise. This assumption was based on analysis of T-DNA in tumors and as a result the majority of T-DNA integration events have been identified exclusively using DNA probes, which are homologous only to DNA from within the T-DNA borders. Where direct gene transfer protocols are employed, any part of the transforming plasmid and indeed accompanying carrier DNA may become integrated into the plant genome. The main body of evidence proving that superfluous vector DNA sequences are present in plant genomes transformed using direct transfer methods is confined to the identification of plasmid concatamers integrated into plant genomes.The limited amount of recorded evidence pertaining to superfluous vector DNA integration in transgenic plants and transformed tissues makes it impossible to draw definitive conclusions as to the factors involved in promoting this phenomenon. However, there are methods available for removing superfluous sequences from transgenic plants. These have been developed for the removal of selectable marker genes, whose presence in transgenic plants has been a source of much controversy, but can equally be applied to other DNA sequences. Suggestions have been made in the review that might limit or prevent the integration of superfluous vector sequences during transformation procedures; however, these are not proven and further research is required.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.