Abstract

AbstractThe Bardeen‐Cooper‐Schrieffer (BCS) model explains superconductivity (SC) as due to correlation between electronic momentum and nuclear momentum (phonons) in a free electron gas. The BCS model lacks chemical specificity, however, since the coupling mechanism is left unspecified. After the discovery of high TC superconductivity in 1986 it was concluded that electron–phonon interactions are insufficient to explain electron pairing. A large part of theoretical research has since been aiming at finding another mechanism that would allow us to consider the superconducting system as a gas of charged free bosons. However, there appears to be no reason to assume free electrons in oxides. In this article the free‐electron criterion is therefore replaced by the criterion that a pair of electrons can move freely between sites without resistance, i.e., without activation energy. Electron pair transfer is treated in a many‐electron real space approach using standard mixed‐valence theories. Mott‐Hubbard‐U is strictly defined, its dependence on breathing mode coordinates analyzed, and the connection between U and the energy gap for superconductivity clarified. d‐wave gap anisotropy is found to be consistent with the general atomic level model presented here. Softening of phonon half‐breathing modes in inelastic neutron scattering (INS) is connected to mixed‐valency. The fundamental vibronic interaction between spin density wave (SDW) and charge density wave (CDW) states leads to a new phase with energy gap and electron pair carriers that can only be the superconducting phase. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2010

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call