Summary of best evidence for pulse contour cardiac output monitoring in severe burn patients

Abstract

Objective: To summarize the best evidence for pulse contour cardiac output (PiCCO) monitoring in severe burn patients. Methods: A bibliometric approach was used. Foreign language databases including UpToDate, BMJ Best Practice, Joanna Briggs Institute Evidence-Based Practice Database, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Medline, and Guideline International Network, as well as Chinese databases such as China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, and VIP Database were systematically retrieved to obtain all the publicly published evidence on PiCCO monitoring in severe burn patients in each database from the establishment of each database to May 2022, including guidelines, expert consensus, evidence summary, systematic review, and original research. The literature was screened and evaluated for the quality, from which the evidences were extracted, evaluated, and classified to summarize the best evidences. Results: Three guidelines, two expert consensuses, one evidence summary (with two systematic reviews being traced), two systematic reviews, three randomized controlled trials, one cohort study, and one case-control study were retrieved and included, with good quality of literature. Totally 37 pieces of best evidences about PiCCO monitoring in severe burn patients were summarized from the aspects of pre-operation evaluation, pipe placement and operation, monitoring system establishment, pipeline maintenance, and supervision and education. Conclusions: Totally 37 pieces of best evidences about PiCCO monitoring in severe burn patients are summarized from 5 aspects, providing a basis for the clinical implementation of scientific and standardized PiCCO monitoring and nursing management.