Abstract
The dominance of the lithium-ion battery in energy storage systems has been met with concerns over dwindling lithium resources and rising cost. A pragmatic alternative can be found in potassium-ion batteries owing to the abundance, lower cost and sustainable production and use of potassium-based cathode materials for largescale energy applications. Therefore, similar to the lithium chemistry, various potassium-based oxides (e.g., K x CoO2 [1], K0.7Fe0.5Mn0.5O2 [2] and K0.27MnO2 [3]) have recently been reported. Parallel to the oxides, a number of polyanion insertion cathode materials have been discovered with credible electrochemical performance (e.g., K3V2(PO4)3[4]). However, unlike the oxides, these polyanionic cathodes inherently suffer from lower theoretical capacity stemming from their high molecular weight, thus decreasing the net energy density. Whilst their capacity is moderate, polyanionic systems offer rich mineral and structural diversity to design potassium-based materials with tunable redox potentials. In this work, we explored the vast materials database of sulphate-based insertion materials for potassium-ion batteries. Apart from containing economic and Earth-abundant elements, sulphate-based minerals can, in principle, exhibit high theoretical capacities owing to their low molecular weight. In our exploration of the sulphate chemistry for potassium-ion batteries, we are able to take advantage of an extensive database of known minerals, particularly the bimetallic and hydrated sulphate derivatives such as karpovite, alunite, fedotovite K2Cu3O(SO4)2, langbeinite (K2M2(SO4)3; M=Fe, Mn, Cu, Co, Ni), picromerite, mereiterite, etc. One such mineral is goldichite, with the general chemical formula K2M(SO4)2・nH2O. Noting that its structure contained possible K-ion diffusion channels, we attempted to design a yavapaiite insertion compound for potassium batteries. We will highlight the syntheses and electrochemical performance in K-ion cells of such sulphate-based minerals. Reference s : [1] Y. Hironaka, K. Kubota and S. Komaba, Chem. Commun., 53 (2017) 3693. [2] X. Wang, X. Xu, C. Niu, J. Meng, M. Huang, X. Liu, Z. Liu and L. Mai, Nano Lett., 17 (2017) 544-550. [3] C. Vaalma, G. A. Giffin, D. Buchholz and S. Passerini, J. Electrochem. Soc., 163 (2016) A1295-A1299. [4] J. Han, G. –N. Li, F. Liu, M. Wang, Y. Zhang, L. Hu, C. Dai and M. Xu, Chem. Commun., 53 (2017) 1805-1808. Figure 1
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.