Abstract

The Yaojialing Zn-Au‑Cu deposit is a porphyry-skarn-epithermal vein-type compound deposit that consists of epithermal vein-type lead‑zinc‑silver orebodies, skarn Zn-Cu-Au orebodies, and porphyry CuAu orebodies from shallow level to depth. We decipher the source and metallogenic mechanism by studying the trace element and S isotopic compositions of sulfides (pyrite, sphalerite, chalcopyrite, and galena) from three types of orebodies. The collected pyrite can be divided into two types. PyI coexists with chalcopyrite, and PyII coexists with sphalerite or galena. In addition, PyI was further divided into PyIa (collected from porphyry copper bodies) and PyIb (collected from skarn copper bodies). PyII can be further divided into PyIIa (collected from skarn-type lead‑zinc ore body) and PyIIb (collected from vein lead‑zinc ore body in strata). Sphalerite and galena from skarn-type PbZn ore bodies and shallow vein-type PbZn ore bodies are named SpI and GnI, and SpII and GnII, respectively.Pyrite and sphalerite trace element thermometers revealed that the temperature of the ore-forming fluids decreased from 500 to 600 °C in the porphyry ore body to 300– 360 °C in the skarn ore body and then to 240– 280 °C in the shallow vein ore body. The decrease in the Co and Ni contents of pyrite collected from deep to shallow depths may indicate that meteoric water precipitated in the late ore-forming hydrothermal system. Rapid crystallization and variations in the physicochemical states (such as temperature, pH, fO2, and geochemical composition) of the fluids resulted in an obvious oscillating zone of euhedral PyI pyrite particles. It also affects the solubility of trace metal elements and leads to the selective entry of these elements into pyrite. PyII also shows obvious zonation characteristics rather than oscillating zonation, indicating that the growth rate of pyrite is relatively slow. Moreover, the relationships between the Au and As contents in the two types of pyrite are different. PyI is coupled, while PyII shows decoupling. We believe that this phenomenon is due to the high content of As in ore-forming fluid systems, which may inhibit the absorption of Au on the surface of pyrite rather than the decoupling of Au and As caused by rapid crystallization, based on the rapid increase in As content and non-oscillating zonation in PyII. According to the analysis of the sulfur isotopes of various sulfides, the solid evidences suggest that the ore-forming materials of each type of orebody in the Yaojialing deposit were mainly derived from magmatic-hydrothermal processes and that the fractionation of sulfur isotopes was the result of variations in physicochemical conditions caused by magma-hydrothermal evolution rather than the addition of foreign sulfur sources.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call