Abstract

Exposure conditions significantly affect the resistance of cements to sulfate attack. This article investigates the sulfate resistance of ordinary portland cement (OPC), sulfate resistant portland cement (SRPC), and blended cements with different proportions of natural pozzolan and Class F fly ash when subjected to different exposure regimes. Plain and blended cement mortar specimens were stored under three different conditions: (i) continuous curing in lime-saturated water, (ii) continuous exposure to 5% Na 2SO 4 solution at room temperature, and (iii) cyclic exposure to 5% Na 2SO 4 solution at room temperature in which the cycles consisted of wetting–drying and heating–cooling. The sulfate resistance of cements was evaluated by measuring the reduction in compressive strength and length change of mortar specimens up to one year of exposure. This study revealed that the performance of blended cements under sodium sulfate solution at room temperature was better than that of SRPC with a 3.6% C 3A content when the length change was considered. However, for the structures exposed to sulfate attack and cycles of wetting–drying and heating–cooling, SRPC was found to perform better than blended cements when the compressive strength losses were considered.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.