Abstract
Tesi Lo scritto intende offrire una lettura dei rapporti tra sequestro preventivo e sham trust fondata sull’ottica propria del diritto e del procedimento penale, da considerarsi fisiologicamente distinta da quella civilistica. Dato conto della dottrina dello sham trust, si esamina la giurisprudenza penale di legittimità (in particolare, la nozione di “disponibilità” da essa tratteggiata e cui ha attribuito rilievo a proposito del sequestro dei beni segregati in un trust) evidenziandone la conformità all’ordinario assetto dei rapporti tra istituti di diritto civile e di diritto penale. The author’s view The paper is aimed to offer an interpretation of the relationship between preventive seizure and sham trust based on the perspective of criminal law and proceedings, to be considered physiologically different from the perspective of civil law. Outlined the doctrine of sham trust, the paper examines the judgements of Italian Supreme Court (in particular, the notion of "availability" and its relevance for the seizure of assets segregated in a trust) highlighting its conformity to the ordinary relations between civil and criminal law.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
