Abstract
Many successful franchise companies consist — other than their name might suggest — of more than just the system’s headquarter and its associated franchisees. Besides independent franchise outlets, the majority of chains operates a significant number of company-owned stores run by employed store managers. The evolution and constant existence of these hybrid organizational forms cannot be explained along a pure principal-agent-view and deserves further analysis. As this article explores, plurally organized franchisors may benefit from effects of cost reduction, quality enhancement, growth stimulation and optimized risk control in contrast to pure franchise chains. Within our sample of 240 franchise systems we found strong empirical support for the quality argument of the Plural Form. Compared to pure franchise companies, plurally organized chains are superior in sending out positive signals to any external community containing internal information and thus in reducing costly agent uncertainty. By running company owned stores as well as independent franchise outlets, chains force themselves successfully into cooperational and less opportunistic behavior towards their franchisees.1 KeywordsPlural FormRoyalty RateInvestment VolumeFranchise SystemFranchise ChainThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.