Successful defibrillation verification in subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients by low-energy shocks.

Abstract

BackgroundThe subcutaneous implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (S‐ICD) is an effective alternative to the transvenous one. Defibrillation efficacy depends on maximum device output and on the optimal device location at device implantation.HypothesisWe sought to investigate the defibrillation safety margin in real life clinical practice.MethodsWe sought to understand what is the efficacy of induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) termination at S‐ICD implantation using lower energies than the recommended 65 J.ResultsSixty‐four consecutive S‐ICD recipients underwent VF termination attempts at implantation with energies ranging from 20 to 50 J. Overall, VF termination occurred in 84% of patients with ≤40 J, in 88% with 45 J, and in 100% with 60 J. Intermuscular S‐ICD placement was associated with 94% VF termination at ≤40 J. An ejection fraction <35% was associated to higher energy requirement for defibrillation; however, an intermuscular S‐ICD placement conferred 90% defibrillation efficacy at 31 ± 5 J in this patients subset.ConclusionsThis is a hypothesis‐generating observation that prompts a methodologically correct investigation to prove that a 60 J output S‐ICD can provide an adequate safety margin to terminate VF in clinical practice. This would enable superior device longevity and/or device downsizing for pediatric/small size patients.