Abstract

This article explains in ten points the concepts of substance, change and matter that appear in the transcendental Analytics of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason as categories and schemes, as well as how they function in the Analogies of Experience. It aims to demonstrate how the category in general, and that of substance in particular, are, in their transcendental ideality, a strategy of the subject to order and objectify the phenomenal world. It establishes that change is also necessary a priori, that both change (accident) and persistence (substance), as well as all appearances, are finite and limited. This would lead to the affirmation that only matter, transcendental matter, is entirely persistent; however, transcendental matter is not a sensible object and therefore those sensible objects that relatively persist in time-space are the only empirical reality of the substance. Finally, matter is made up of forces, and given that there is nothing simple in matter, it can be inferred that empirical substance is nothing other than a field of forces.
 Recebido / Received: 14.6.2019.Aprovado / Approved: 1.8.2019.

Highlights

  • Carsten, “Ich, Selbstbewusstsein und der psychologische Paralogismus. Zur möglichen Bestimmung reflexiver Subjektivität und zur unmöglichen Bestimmung einer Ich-Substanz bei Kant“, Kant-Studien 109(2), 2018, p. 228-248

  • Olk, Carsten, “Ich, Selbstbewusstsein und der psychologische Paralogismus

  • If the substance can only be altered in its accidents but cannot be made to appear and disappear[73], if the substance cannot arise nor perish[74], it may be thought that, the transcendental and ideal requirement expressed in the category of substance points not to something permanent that may be different in each case, but to something concrete and real always persistent in the time-space of the sensible world as the ultimate support of any change

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Carsten, “Ich, Selbstbewusstsein und der psychologische Paralogismus. Zur möglichen Bestimmung reflexiver Subjektivität und zur unmöglichen Bestimmung einer Ich-Substanz bei Kant“, Kant-Studien 109(2), 2018, p. 228-248.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call