Abstract

The purpose of this article is to identify the risks, threats, and challenges associated with possible social changes in the processes of digitalization of society and transformations of traditional communication practices, which is associated with the emergence of new digital subjects of mass public communication that form the pseudo structure of digital interaction of people. The primary tasks of the work were to identify the potential of artificial intelligence technologies and neural networks in the field of social and political communications, as well as to analyze the features of “smart” communications in terms of their subjectness. As a methodological optics, the work used the method of discourse analysis of scientific research devoted to the implementation and application of artificial intelligence technologies and self-learning neural networks in the processes of social and political digitalization, as well as the method of critical analysis of current communication practices in the socio-political sphere. At the same time, when analyzing the current digitalization practices, the case study method was used. The authors substantiate the thesis that introducing technological solutions based on artificial intelligence algorithms and self-learning neural networks into contemporary processes of socio-political communication creates the potential for a wide range of challenges, threats, and risks, the key of which is the problem of identifying the actual subjects of digital communication acts. The article also discusses the problem of increasing the manipulative potential of “smart” communications, for which the authors used the concepts of cyber simulacrum and information capsule developed by them. The paper shows that artificial intelligence and self-learning neural network algorithms, being increasingly widely introduced into the current practice of contemporary digital communications, form a high potential for information and communication impact on the mass consciousness from technological solutions that no longer require control by operators – humans. As a result, conditions arise to form a hybrid socio-technical reality – a communication reality of a new type with mixed subjectness. The paper also concludes that in the current practices of social interactions in the digital space, a person faces a new phenomenon – interfaceization, within which self-communication stimulates the universalization and standardization of digital behavior, creating, disseminating, strengthening, and imposing special digital rituals. In the article, the authors suggest that digital rituals blur the line between the activity of digital avatars based on artificial intelligence and the activity of actual people, resulting in the potential for a person to lose his own subjectness in the digital communications space.

Highlights

  • The contemporary digitalization of social and political processes is characterized by its high intensity

  • The range of problems, challenges, and risks associated with the digitalization of contemporary society and introducing artificial intelligence technologies and neural networks into the current practice of socio-political interaction is not limited to the questions posed

  • As the analysis of the current practice of digitalization demonstrates, contemporary technologies will allow soon to replace the individual with a neural network algorithm, the function of which will be the implementation of information and communication activities on behalf of an actual user based on the analysis of user preferences and his previous experience assimilated by artificial intelligence

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The contemporary digitalization of social and political processes is characterized by its high intensity. The range of problems, challenges, and risks associated with the digitalization of contemporary society and introducing artificial intelligence technologies and neural networks into the current practice of socio-political interaction is not limited to the questions posed. Daft, who suggested that rich and varied information should reach a person through the same diverse communication technologies (Daft, Lengel, 1986) Despite criticism of this theoretical model, contemporary political science works have appeared that use the concept of media capabilities to analyze the use of chatbots with artificial intelligence on e-government resources (Androutsopoulou, Karacapilidis et al, 2019). As the analysis of the current practice of digitalization demonstrates, contemporary technologies will allow soon to replace the individual with a neural network algorithm, the function of which will be the implementation of information and communication activities on behalf of an actual user based on the analysis of user preferences and his previous experience assimilated by artificial intelligence. Values, and meanings will broadcast in the digital space to actual users who are unaware that they are not communicating with a living person, but only with artificial intelligence? To what extent will a person be able to cope, due to his exclusively human abilities, with neural networks that analyze a communication partner? To what extent can a human personality be able to resist the software algorithm on an equal footing in the framework of communication interaction both with him and with each other?5 What will be the manipulative potential of neural networks that, based on the analysis of personal digital traces, can impact a person’s consciousness who is convinced that he is communicating not with artificial intelligence but with an actual person? The answers to these questions seem to be open

CYBER SIMULACRA AND DIGITAL INFORMATION CAPSULES
DIGITAL AVATARIZATION AND DIGITAL INTERFACES
THE PHENOMENON OF ALGOCRACY
Hybridization of Subjectness
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call