Subcultural Effects on Judicial Behavior: A Comparative Analysis

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessArticlesSubcultural Effects on Judicial Behavior: A Comparative AnalysisGlendon SchubertGlendon Schubert Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Politics Volume 42, Number 4Nov., 1980 Sponsored by the Southern Political Science Association Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.2307/2130733 Views: 7Total views on this site Citations: 11Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1980 Southern Political Science AssociationPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Robert Mattes Systematic, Quantitative Political Science in South Africa: the Road Less Travelled, Politikon 40, no.33 (Dec 2013): 479–499.https://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2013.853948C. L. Ostberg, Matthew E. Wetstein, Craig R. Ducat Attitudinal Dimensions of Supreme Court Decision Making in Canada: The Lamer Court, 1991-1995, Political Research Quarterly 55, no.11 (Jul 2016): 235–256.https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290205500110John C. Anderson, Marianne M. Jennings, Steven E. Kaplan, Philip M.J. Reckers The effect of using diagnostic decision aids for analytical procedures on judges' liability judgments, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 14, no.11 (Mar 1995): 33–62.https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4254(94)00021-RMARIANNE JENNINGS, DAN C. KNEER, PHILIP M. J. RECKERS The Significance of Audit Decision Aids and Precase Jurists' Attitudes on Perceptions of Audit Firm Culpability and Liability, Contemporary Accounting Research 9, no.22 (Mar 1993): 489–507.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1993.tb00894.xC. Neal Tate The Development of Comparative Judicial Politics, Perspectives on Political Science 21, no.33 (Jun 1992): 138–144.https://doi.org/10.1080/10457097.1992.9941845C. NEAL TATE JUDICIAL INSTITUTIONS IN CROSS-NATIONAL PERSPECTIVE: TOWARD INTEGRATING COURTS INTO THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF POLITICS, (Jan 1987): 7–33.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-408-03165-3.50008-8GLENDON SCHUBERT SUBCULTURES AND JUDICIAL BACKGROUND: A CROSS–CULTURAL ANALYSIS, (Jan 1987): 222–239.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-408-03165-3.50020-9Stephen B. Saetz, Glendon Schubert Letters, Politics and the Life Sciences 5, no.11 (May 2016): 137–138.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0730938400001738Ellen L. Evans Catholic Political Movements in Germany, Switzerland, and the Netherlands: Notes for a Comparative Approach, Central European History 17, no.2-32-3 (Dec 2008): 91–119.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008938900016423James L. Gibson From simplicity to complexity: The development of theory in the study of judicial behavior, Political Behavior 5, no.11 (Jan 1983): 7–49.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989985C. Neal Tate The methodology of judicial behavior research: A review and critique, Political Behavior 5, no.11 (Jan 1983): 51–82.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989986