Study of the Quality Reputation of Military Automobile Polit Training

Abstract

Automobile driver training is an important part of the military force training, quality driver training, directly affect the army security force generation and enhance combat capability. In the evaluation of driver training quality, is to strengthen the team construction, an important measure to improve the transportation of materials support ability and the rapid mobility. To research and Analysis on the current car driver training in the assessment of quality evaluation system problems, find a better car driver training quality, the automobile driver training will play a great role in promoting. This article conducts the analysis research from home and abroad and the military force vehicle driver training quality assessment model, research on comprehensive domestic training quality evaluation system, through the use of the analytic hierarchy process, combined with the assessment of the actual problem of military driver training status and driver training quality, through research and analysis of sufficient, established a set of scientific, reasonable and accurate driver training quality evaluation system, the evaluation system is verified by practical application. Through the research on the evaluation of driver training quality, ensure that the driver's training quality, ensure that the armed forces transportation guarantee capability and fast transport capacity. Research on Training Quality Evaluation System Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Determine the Weight. Structure Hierarchy Model. The factors which affect the quality of driver training are organized and hierarchical, and a hierarchical structure model is constructed. In this model, the hierarchy can be divided into three categories: top (the target layer) has only one element, is the quality of driver training is analysis of predetermined goals or desired results; intermediate layer (criteria) including the for the realization of the goal involved the middle part, a total of 3 first level indicators; the bottom (scheme) layer includes the specific evaluation index, 11 second grade indexes. The hierarchical model constructed is shown in Table 1.