Abstract
A comparison was made between the dissipation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soil freshly spiked with pure PAHs, soil spiked with a coal tar mixture and a contaminated soil from a former coking works where the PAHs had been present for more than a century. The potential of five selected plant species for phytoremediation was investigated. The levels of all 7 PAHs in chemically amended soil, both planted and unplanted, fell significantly (>80% reduction) over the 12 weeks of the growing trial. In the coal tar treated soils all PAHs were significantly reduced. In both the planted and unplanted soils the 2–3 ringed compounds demonstrated much greater loss (>77%) than the 4–6 ringed (16–39%). The 3–4 ringed compounds demonstrated strong evidence of phytoremediation but not the 5–6 ringed. The coking soil showed limited reduction (7–24%) of all 12 PAHs present. There was little difference in dissipation between the PAHs and little evidence of a phytoremediation effect in coking soil. The results demonstrated that the form in which PAHs were added to soil influenced their susceptibility to dissipation. Therefore, predictions of PAH dissipation from laboratory amended soil do not reflect the true situation in the field.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.